By Boakye Stephen | Reporting for Ghanaian News Canada April 9, 2026
The Member of Parliament for Gomoa Central, Kwame Asare Obeng, popularly known as A-Plus, has stirred political conversation across Ghana after making a bold and unconventional declaration—expressing strong support for President John Mahama while firmly distancing himself from any political party affiliation.
In remarks that challenge Ghana’s deeply rooted partisan culture, A-Plus emphasized that his support for Mahama is based on conviction and observed governance, not party loyalty.
“I believed strongly that John Mahama’s second term was going to be what it is now. So far, so very good, but it doesn’t make me NDC,” he stated.
His comments signal a departure from Ghana’s traditional political alignment, where public figures are often expected to clearly identify with either the National Democratic Congress (NDC) or the New Patriotic Party (NPP).
A-Plus further expanded on his position, making it clear that his political outlook is not confined to one side of the political divide.
“I am a strong supporter of John Mahama, same as Akufo-Addo,” he added, referencing former President Nana Akufo-Addo.
The MP went on to stress that competence and leadership potential exist across party lines, urging Ghanaians to rethink how they assess political figures.
“There are so many people in both political parties that I like, who I think can be presidents of Ghana. But that doesn’t make me NDC. There are also people in the NPP that I think, given the opportunity, will perform.”
His remarks come at a time when Ghana’s political landscape remains heavily polarized, with party loyalty often shaping public discourse and voter behavior.
Analysts say A-Plus’ position introduces a different framework—one that prioritizes performance and individual merit over party allegiance. By openly supporting leaders from opposing political traditions, he challenges the binary nature of Ghanaian politics.
The statement has sparked mixed reactions, with some praising his independent stance as refreshing and necessary, while others question whether such a position is sustainable within a system largely driven by party structures and electoral loyalty.
Ghana’s Fourth Republic has long been characterized by strong party identities, with the NDC and NPP dominating the political space. In this context, A-Plus’ approach represents a shift toward what some observers describe as “issue-based politics.”
His comments also highlight a broader debate about the future of democracy in Ghana—whether the country can transition from a system defined by partisan loyalty to one driven by performance, accountability, and critical evaluation of leadership.
While it remains unclear how widely this perspective will resonate with the electorate, the discussion it has triggered underscores a growing appetite among some citizens for political independence and a break from traditional alignments.
As Ghana continues to evolve politically, A-Plus’ “support without submission” stance may signal the emergence of a new political mindset—one that challenges the status quo and redefines what it means to engage in national leadership.
