Stephen Amoah Rejects Global InfoAnalytics Poll, Describes Findings as ‘Dangerous and Baseless’
Lead: Member of Parliament for Nhyiaeso, Dr Stephen Amoah, has rejected a parliamentary performance poll by Global InfoAnalytics that ranked him among poorly performing MPs, describing the findings as dangerous and lacking a credible basis.
By Boakye Stephen, Kumasi, Ghana | Reporting for Ghanaian News, Canada | July 22,2026
Speaking to journalists in Parliament, Dr Amoah questioned the methodology used by the research firm, arguing that the assessment failed to properly reflect the constitutional and practical responsibilities of Members of Parliament.
He challenged the basis on which constituency expectations such as roads, currency stability and other national concerns were used to assess the performance of individual MPs.
Dr Amoah maintained that his record includes legislative work, constituency development initiatives and personal financial support for projects and community members.
He cited the construction of a library for a community and the establishment of a health fund for party activists, agents and coordinators as examples of initiatives he said demonstrate his commitment to his constituents.
The Nhyiaeso MP argued that the survey risked creating a distorted public perception of parliamentary performance by relying on criteria that, in his view, did not adequately capture the full responsibilities and contributions of legislators.
Global InfoAnalytics’ June 2026 survey assessed public perceptions of MPs across 83 constituencies. The poll ranked the Nsawam/Adoagyiri MP, Frank Annoh-Dompreh, as the highest-rated legislator, while the MP for Asene-Manso-Akrosorecorded the lowest approval rating.
Dr Amoah said he believed his performance over the past six years placed him among the country’s top-performing MPs and strongly rejected his classification as a non-performing legislator.
Commentary | Boakye Stephen
The dispute highlights the continuing debate over how parliamentary performance should be measured, with questions arising over whether public approval polls should focus primarily on legislative work, constituency development, national advocacy, or a combination of all these responsibilities.
